|
|
Post by Agent Orange on Sept 25, 2012 13:24:41 GMT -7
 From this view I don't know, Tate may have caught it with him, looks like he has one hand under it too, and they both come down with it. |
|
|
|
Post by Big Dog on Sept 25, 2012 14:24:38 GMT -7
I hate to agree with anything that would help the Packers, but in my opinion, they got wronged on that deal. That's an interception. Having a hand on it doesn't make it a reception.
|
|
Rapid
No Side Bar
Posts: 3,223
|
Post by Rapid on Sept 25, 2012 14:40:02 GMT -7
BRING back!!!! real refs!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by Charliedog on Sept 25, 2012 14:41:13 GMT -7
Never allow yourself to be in a position where one bad call can get you beat. Packers lost the game on all the other plays they did not execute. Sure Replacements suck big time but Win without bragging and lose without excuse
|
|
|
|
Post by Jades on Sept 25, 2012 16:16:32 GMT -7
I agree with Big Dog, Interception and I hate the Pack!!
|
|
|
|
Post by jayster1 on Sept 25, 2012 16:32:36 GMT -7
What about the roughing the passer penalty earlier in the drive that kept it alive? That was a terrible call. What about Tate pushing his defender down? That was offensive pass-interference. I don't know if the replacements are that bad or the scrutiny is just off the charts!
|
|
|
|
Post by pbjelly on Sept 26, 2012 12:35:44 GMT -7
The key is that he only had one hand in there. The other was on Jennings arm. INTERCEPTION
|
|
|
|
Post by Agent Orange on Sept 26, 2012 13:35:05 GMT -7
|
|
|
|
Post by Agent Orange on Sept 26, 2012 19:49:57 GMT -7
Another conspiracy theory  |
|
