|
|
Post by Agent Orange on Nov 26, 2011 16:06:15 GMT -7
Which will be the best game? and who do you got winning?
3A
Lovington @ St. Mikes
4A
Goddard @ Aztec
5A
Cleveland @ Mayfield
|
|
Rapid
No Side Bar
Posts: 3,223
|
Post by Rapid on Nov 26, 2011 16:14:22 GMT -7
What was the final score the last i heard Valencia was leading 41-31
|
|
|
|
Post by bulldog96 on Nov 26, 2011 16:16:25 GMT -7
St. Mikes/Lovington game in Santa Fe according to the proview network guy announcing Eunice/Santa Rosa game.
|
|
Rapid
No Side Bar
Posts: 3,223
|
Post by Rapid on Nov 26, 2011 16:17:06 GMT -7
Best game will be Goddard vs Aztec...Goddard will win state.
|
|
|
|
Post by bulldog96 on Nov 26, 2011 16:17:53 GMT -7
Aztec 47-41 final
|
|
|
|
Post by Agent Orange on Nov 26, 2011 16:18:40 GMT -7
St. Mikes/Lovington game in Santa Fe according to the proview network guy announcing Eunice/Santa Rosa game. Crud, no football around this area then next weekend. Thanks for the info. |
|
|
|
Post by Agent Orange on Nov 26, 2011 16:20:33 GMT -7
Best game will be Goddard vs Aztec...Goddard will win state. You think it will be a close game Rapid? I'd say Mayfield vs Cleveland is the most interesting game to me. |
|
|
|
Post by bdogfan on Nov 26, 2011 17:01:50 GMT -7
St Michael's/Lovington game will be a good one. I think Lovington is going to pull it off.
|
|
|
|
Post by BGP on Nov 26, 2011 17:38:19 GMT -7
Lovington
Goddard
Cleveland (gotta let the north have 1 this year!)
|
|
Rapid
No Side Bar
Posts: 3,223
|
Post by Rapid on Nov 26, 2011 17:53:56 GMT -7
No, it's going be a high scoring game.
|
|
|
|
Post by Charliedog on Nov 26, 2011 18:22:54 GMT -7
St Mikes starts 18 underclassmen and are undefeated and only giving up 5.7 pts per game. I have a strong favoritism in this game as my future Son In Law is the Defensive Coordinator.
|
|
|
|
Post by Agent Orange on Nov 26, 2011 21:09:22 GMT -7
I'm suprised Lovington made it back to State, I figured Silver was the team to beat this year in 3A. I'm sure the weather was horrible in Lovington today like it was in Artesia, such a low scoring game. It would be hard to pick against Lovington given their tradition.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 1, 2011 14:31:17 GMT -7
I still wonder about this "owing" games. Cleveland goes undefeated and has to travel to LC dispite the better regular season? The other way wouldnt be fair if Mafield was higher seeded. Kind of puts a damper on the regular season results. Hop0efully some of you agree with me.
|
|
|
|
Post by Agent Orange on Dec 1, 2011 14:47:45 GMT -7
I still wonder about this "owing" games. Cleveland goes undefeated and has to travel to LC dispite the better regular season? The other way wouldnt be fair if Mafield was higher seeded. Kind of puts a damper on the regular season results. Hop0efully some of you agree with me. Mayfield had to travel to Cleveland last year for a playoff game Mike, so Cleveland must return the favor this year, I think that's fair enough.  That's the way it's always been in New Mexico, the other alternative some would like to see is all state title games played in Albq, which no one down south agrees with. It may change one day but I like the current system. |
|
|
|
Post by jayster1 on Dec 1, 2011 15:49:19 GMT -7
I still wonder about this "owing" games. Cleveland goes undefeated and has to travel to LC dispite the better regular season? The other way wouldnt be fair if Mafield was higher seeded. Kind of puts a damper on the regular season results. Hop0efully some of you agree with me. Why would you want to give teams an incentive to have a weak schedule? (Obviously this doesn't apply to Cleveland this year) You are going to get Jades all fired up again! |
|
|
|
Post by alumni96 on Dec 1, 2011 17:00:19 GMT -7
Nope I dont agree. Why should we have to make it convient for them? They can do just like every other team does and owe whoever and go play on the road. Thats what makes a team if they can win on the road. SORRY its been like that forever. Take it as it is
|
|
|
|
Post by Jades on Dec 1, 2011 19:45:43 GMT -7
I still wonder about this "owing" games. Cleveland goes undefeated and has to travel to LC dispite the better regular season? The other way wouldnt be fair if Mafield was higher seeded. Kind of puts a damper on the regular season results. Hop0efully some of you agree with me. Why would you want to give teams an incentive to have a weak schedule? (Obviously this doesn't apply to Cleveland this year) You are going to get Jades all fired up again! LOL, Don't get me started Jayster, we'll have Peanut Butter & Jelly all over the counter!!! |
|
|
|
Post by pbjelly on Dec 1, 2011 20:07:44 GMT -7
Hey, don't drag me in on this. LOL
|
|
|
|
Post by jayster1 on Dec 1, 2011 23:06:29 GMT -7
Why would you want to give teams an incentive to have a weak schedule? (Obviously this doesn't apply to Cleveland this year) You are going to get Jades all fired up again! LOL, Don't get me started Jayster, we'll have Peanut Butter & Jelly all over the counter!!! Just trying to get one more good thread going before season is over! |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 2, 2011 11:51:03 GMT -7
No its not a Cleveland or RR thing, I just think it diminishes the regular season. Pick your team say Artesia has a 9-1 schedule and are seeded #1 and St Pius gets a #10 seed with a 6-4 record. Pius gets hot in the playoffs and wins 3 games but they get to stay home while Artesia has to travel to Albuq because the last game in 2005 was in Artesia. And everybody knows how hard a schedule Artesia plays. Did the coaches actually vote on this system? If they agreed with it no problem but if I was a head coach no way I would vote for that system even though it would possibly hurt my team.
|
|
